Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Provide built-in GraalVM Reachability Metadata and introduce a separate nativeTest in CI #2258

Closed
5 tasks done
linghengqian opened this issue Sep 13, 2023 · 5 comments · Fixed by #2417
Closed
5 tasks done

Comments

@linghengqian
Copy link
Member

linghengqian commented Sep 13, 2023

Feature Request

For English only, other languages will not accept.

Please pay attention on issues you submitted, because we maybe need more details.
If no response anymore and we cannot make decision by current information, we will close it.

Please answer these questions before submitting your issue. Thanks!

Is your feature request related to a problem?

Describe the feature you would like.

@linghengqian
Copy link
Member Author

  • I'm working on this issue.

@zjx990
Copy link
Contributor

zjx990 commented Sep 15, 2023

我们在做这种自动化测试的时候,可以引入一个场景么,就是一个客户端或者准确的说一个真正执行作业的server,它的极限。
例如: 这台实例是900个作业的执行节点也就是真正的server。这900个作业都是一秒调度一次,这台server什么时候会到它的承受极限。
我的想法: 我的想法是关注它的cpu信息,因为作业的调度是有周期的,它的cpu波动也会周期,作业占用的内存我先忽略不计,如果它的cpu峰值达到70%,那么我就认为这台实例的极限就是900.

@linghengqian
Copy link
Member Author

  • @zjx990 This is a bit hard for me to understand how to handle. After all, the Github Actions device only has 8GB of memory, and Github Actions only has AMD64 devices. On ARM64 we will need to perform instruction set simulation, which may lead to inconsistent test results between AMD64 and ARM64.

  • If necessary, you can open another issue and submit some PR.

  • I do not expect that the current issue will be open for a long time. This issue partly involves factors outside the project, such as the review efficiency of the GraalVM Team.

@linghengqian
Copy link
Member Author

@linghengqian
Copy link
Member Author

我们在做这种自动化测试的时候,可以引入一个场景么,就是一个客户端或者准确的说一个真正执行作业的server,它的极限。 例如: 这台实例是900个作业的执行节点也就是真正的server。这900个作业都是一秒调度一次,这台server什么时候会到它的承受极限。 我的想法: 我的想法是关注它的cpu信息,因为作业的调度是有周期的,它的cpu波动也会周期,作业占用的内存我先忽略不计,如果它的cpu峰值达到70%,那么我就认为这台实例的极限就是900.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment