Pin protobuf version for TF dependency tests

[jrmccluskey]

The Tensorflow dependency test running against TensorFlow 2.12 was failing as the test environment was separately installing protobuf 5.x. This ensures that an appropriate protobuf version is installed before installing beam deps.

Fresh run of the workflow against this branch is running at https://github.com/apache/beam/actions/runs/11258372012 - there are some pandas/numpy failures that are unrelated.

---

Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:

• Mention the appropriate issue in your description (for example: addresses #123), if applicable. This will automatically add a link to the pull request in the issue. If you would like the issue to automatically close on merging the pull request, comment fixes #<ISSUE NUMBER> instead.
• Update CHANGES.md with noteworthy changes.
• If this contribution is large, please file an Apache Individual Contributor License Agreement.

See the Contributor Guide for more tips on how to make review process smoother.

To check the build health, please visit https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.test-infra/BUILD_STATUS.md

GitHub Actions Tests Status (on master branch)

See CI.md for more information about GitHub Actions CI or the workflows README to see a list of phrases to trigger workflows.

[github-actions]

Assigning reviewers. If you would like to opt out of this review, comment assign to next reviewer:

R: @tvalentyn for label python.

Available commands:

• stop reviewer notifications - opt out of the automated review tooling
• remind me after tests pass - tag the comment author after tests pass
• waiting on author - shift the attention set back to the author (any comment or push by the author will return the attention set to the reviewers)

The PR bot will only process comments in the main thread (not review comments).

[jrmccluskey]

hmm, this is working locally but the protobuf version is getting clobbered when the action runs. weird.

[jrmccluskey]

for the record this is still not working, the protobuf version keeps being upgraded. current idea is to just disable these tests so we get signal from the rest of the suite while I figure out how to fix them

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 58.92%. Comparing base (02e0b3a) to head (99b6906).
Report is 40 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master   #32719      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     58.84%   58.92%   +0.07%     
  Complexity     3091     3091              
============================================
  Files          1130     1130              
  Lines        174103   174399     +296     
  Branches       3312     3312              
============================================
+ Hits         102451   102764     +313     
+ Misses        68326    68309      -17     
  Partials       3326     3326              

Flag	Coverage Δ
python	81.51% <ø> (+0.10%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[jrmccluskey]

Okay, got a clean run on https://github.com/apache/beam/actions/runs/11298052670/job/31426200604 (the numpy failures have been fixed on master)

[tvalentyn]

PTAL at lint errors

[jrmccluskey]

I don't understand how there's a linting failure when the only file changed isn't python and doesn't get linted...

[jrmccluskey]

Everything green, merging