Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Prompting for timed user input in continuous mode #3971

Closed
1 task done
guacamole-hunter opened this issue May 7, 2023 · 4 comments
Closed
1 task done

Prompting for timed user input in continuous mode #3971

guacamole-hunter opened this issue May 7, 2023 · 4 comments
Labels

Comments

@guacamole-hunter
Copy link

Duplicates

  • I have searched the existing issues

Summary 💡

I think it make sense to prompt for user input relating to if its ontrack with its goals in continuous mode but with a timer where it will continue without feedback if timer ends.

Examples 🌈

For it to prompt for user input when changing main goal, and continues with no feedback if no response in 2 min or some other amount of time.

Motivation 🔦

I think this can be useful feature so you don't have to restart the container if you wanted to add user input at some point And if you don't just let it continue, or enter to continue now. Also slows down continous mode a bit to help better analyze.

@guacamole-hunter guacamole-hunter changed the title Prompting for user input in continuous mode Prompting for timed user input in continuous mode May 7, 2023
@Boostrix
Copy link
Contributor

Boostrix commented May 7, 2023

nice idea, and one heavily related to a number of open PRs

I'd suggest to read through some of these and reach out to the corresponding folks to leave your feedback there

@Boostrix
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, just a short update - thanks for taking the time to update your PR, your PR was today discussed on Discord by several devs and it's being assigned to be reviewed right now!

So, given that there seem to be at least 5+ different PRs in the pipeline currently using similar but still a different method, it is likely that we're going to take parts from each and every one of these PRs, to ensure that the feature is well-aligned with the ongoing re-arch effort.

This means, you will end up in the credits automagically - but won't have to do any more work from now on.

If there are remaining questions, someone is going to contact you, the PR is being reviewed by @gravelBridge

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 6, 2023

This issue has automatically been marked as stale because it has not had any activity in the last 50 days. You can unstale it by commenting or removing the label. Otherwise, this issue will be closed in 10 days.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Sep 6, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

This issue was closed automatically because it has been stale for 10 days with no activity.

@github-actions github-actions bot closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Sep 18, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants