You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm doing some work on improving the presentation of the samples, and at the moment I'm working on the AutoFilter examples.
It got me thinking: how useful would it be for the toArray() methods (including rangeToArray() and namedRangeToArray()) to accept an additional argument that indicates whether hidden rows and columns should be returned, or not.
Default behaviour should remain "as is", including hidden rows/columns in the returned array.
Note that it's already very simply to code using the row/column Iterators to ignore hidden rows/columns; but toArray() doesn't have this option at all.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
I'm doing some work on improving the presentation of the samples, and at the moment I'm working on the AutoFilter examples.
It got me thinking: how useful would it be for the
toArray()
methods (includingrangeToArray()
andnamedRangeToArray()
) to accept an additional argument that indicates whether hidden rows and columns should be returned, or not.Default behaviour should remain "as is", including hidden rows/columns in the returned array.
Note that it's already very simply to code using the row/column Iterators to ignore hidden rows/columns; but
toArray()
doesn't have this option at all.See PR #3494 for the proposed change
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions