Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OBF Mailing Lists #42

Open
cjfields opened this issue Dec 19, 2017 · 11 comments
Open

OBF Mailing Lists #42

cjfields opened this issue Dec 19, 2017 · 11 comments

Comments

@cjfields
Copy link
Member

cjfields commented Dec 19, 2017

(@hlapp : this is per the OBF Board Meeting; is there any other more general repo this can go to?)

As @peterjc has noted on the main OBF blog, the OBF hosted mail lists (including the various EMBOSS list and other general member lists) have had serious issues over the last several months due to heavy spam traffic on the OBF mailman server. We are soliciting community feedback from both EMBOSS and general OBF developers and users for the next steps forward on resolving this issue (see below). Please post suggestions or concerns here.

We (OBF) are migrating to a hosted solution that should provide more stability, with the downside that many lists will be shut down and archived due to hosting costs. The blog post details some suggestions.

Again, please note your concerns as soon as possible. We would like feedback by Dec. 28 so that we can decide on the next steps.

Thanks all!

@cjfields

Update: Links to the relevant project-specific issues (including feedback):

BioPerl: bioperl/bioperl-live#258
Biopython: biopython/biopython#1481
Bioruby: bioruby/bioruby#118
BioJava: biojava/biojava#717

@nlharris
Copy link
Member

I don't see a way to add line-by-line comments, so I'll just mention that I would change the word "closed" in "lists will be closed and archived" to "shut down" (because "closed" could be interpreted to mean "not open to the public).

Other than that, it looks good.

@cjfields
Copy link
Member Author

cjfields commented Dec 19, 2017

Thanks @nlharris ! Also, this has been posted to Biostar. I can tweet that link as well.

@peterjc
Copy link
Member

peterjc commented Jan 17, 2018

@peterjc
Copy link
Member

peterjc commented Jan 18, 2018

Merging biojava-dev into biojava-l is done, see biojava/biojava#717

@peterjc
Copy link
Member

peterjc commented Jan 22, 2018

Merging emboss-dev into emboss is done, see http://mailman.open-bio.org/pipermail/emboss-dev/2018-January/001503.html

@nlharris
Copy link
Member

Are there still tasks to do here, or can this be closed?

@peterjc
Copy link
Member

peterjc commented Dec 13, 2022

There are still EMBOSS ones to do, there was no objection.

@nlharris
Copy link
Member

nlharris commented Dec 13, 2022

Does anyone even use any of the EMBOSS lists anymore?

Lists to migrate (please edit as appropriate):

  • Bioperl
  • Biopython
  • Biojava
  • Bioruby
  • EMBOSS

@hlapp
Copy link
Member

hlapp commented Dec 14, 2022

Are the checkmarks supposed to indicate completion of migration? (None of these have been migrated)

@nlharris
Copy link
Member

Oh. I optimistically interpreted Peter's comment, "There are still EMBOSS ones to do," as meaning that the rest were done. I will uncheck them.

@peterjc
Copy link
Member

peterjc commented Dec 14, 2022

I thought this was for tracking consolidation within mailman, not migration which is the next step.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants