You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
dandelany opened this issue
Oct 3, 2024
· 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
featureA new feature or feature requestgatewayAny issues related to the Aerie Gateway servicerefactorA code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature
Low-priority follow-up to NASA-AMMOS/aerie-gateway#109 - this PR includes a “faux transaction” ie. our code rolls back DB state if anything goes wrong during import to avoid corruption. This is theoretically almost as safe as a DB transaction, unless gateway dies/errors halfway through.
Description
We'd like to refactor the gateway to use "real" DB transactions for Plan Import (& potentially other similar operations). However this is complicated by two things:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
dandelany
added
refactor
A code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature
feature
A new feature or feature request
gateway
Any issues related to the Aerie Gateway service
labels
Oct 3, 2024
featureA new feature or feature requestgatewayAny issues related to the Aerie Gateway servicerefactorA code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature
Background
Low-priority follow-up to NASA-AMMOS/aerie-gateway#109 - this PR includes a “faux transaction” ie. our code rolls back DB state if anything goes wrong during import to avoid corruption. This is theoretically almost as safe as a DB transaction, unless gateway dies/errors halfway through.
Description
We'd like to refactor the gateway to use "real" DB transactions for Plan Import (& potentially other similar operations). However this is complicated by two things:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: