-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
added missing matrix exponentiation methods #29782
Conversation
base/mathconstants.jl
Outdated
@@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ catalan | |||
# loop over types to prevent ambiguities for ^(::Number, x) | |||
for T in (AbstractIrrational, Rational, Integer, Number, Complex) | |||
Base.:^(::Irrational{:ℯ}, x::T) = exp(x) | |||
Base.:^(::Irrational{:ℯ}, x::AbstractMatrix{T}) = exp(x) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The loop says it's for ambiguities. Shouldn't we instead have a general
Base.:^(::Irrational{:ℯ}, x) = exp(x)
fallback?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't know, wouldn't that still allow for the ambiguities of ^(::Number, x)
? I would have thought it can create an ambiguity if we have the fallback, even if we have the specific methods.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In that case, maybe just add AbstractMatrix
to the thing that T
loops over?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This should be defined in LinearAlgebra.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I didn't want to add AbstractMatrix
as T
to the loop because I thought it would be safer (in regard to method ambiguities) to ensure that only matrices with these element types have exponentials defined for them. Having said that, I just realized that this should have read AbstractMatrix{<:T}
rather than what I have here.
Let me know whether you think this should indeed be fore general AbstractMatrix
and I'll move it to LinearAlgebra
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since exp(::AbstractMatrix)
is defined in LinearAlgebra
this should too.
Ok, wasn't quite sure where to put this. Most of the methods are in By the way, I don't see a The tests seem a bit awkward where I put them, but I didn't know where else they would go. |
@@ -340,6 +340,9 @@ rdiv!(A, B) | |||
copy_oftype(A::AbstractArray{T}, ::Type{T}) where {T} = copy(A) | |||
copy_oftype(A::AbstractArray{T,N}, ::Type{S}) where {T,N,S} = convert(AbstractArray{S,N}, A) | |||
|
|||
# matrix exponentials for ℯ | |||
Base.:^(::Irrational{:ℯ}, A::AbstractMatrix) = exp(A) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would move this just below
julia/stdlib/LinearAlgebra/src/dense.jl
Line 490 in 84024a1
exp(A::StridedMatrix{<:Union{Integer,Complex{<:Integer}}}) = exp!(float.(A)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
are you sure about that? the reason I didn't put it in there is because it is only for dense, it could work for sparse array types as well.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But it doesn't, this is the generic exp
so I would put it here.
stdlib/LinearAlgebra/test/dense.jl
Outdated
@@ -401,6 +401,10 @@ end | |||
[4.000000000000000 -1.414213562373094 -1.414213562373095 | |||
-1.414213562373095 4.999999999999996 -0.000000000000000 | |||
0 -0.000000000000002 3.000000000000000]) | |||
|
|||
# alias using ℯ, should be exact | |||
@test ℯ^(fill(2, (4,4))) == exp(fill(2, (4,4))) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would also move these test out the loop over the elty
, maybe to a separate sub-testset.
I've had something similar on my list and was actually planning to open a PR for this just now. 😄 I think it would be really nice for consistency to also have |
Yeah, good point, I don't know how I forgot about the general method (i.e. for Ok, the tests I wrote yesterday were awful, I've cleaned them up a bit so that they test more eltypes and they are in their own little section. Are you really sure you want these methods in |
Not sure what error travis had on MacOS. I don't know if it's just bad luck, but I feel like every time I make a PR I wind up with bogus failures on MacOS. |
Is any action needed here? I'm guessing this is probably not a real error on MacOS (as this has happened multiple times before and linux passes), can we re-trigger somehow? |
Seems to be passing now? |
Ok, I don't know what the deal was with that thing. The MacOS seems to have had bogus failures every time I've ever made a PR. |
stdlib/LinearAlgebra/src/dense.jl
Outdated
@@ -489,6 +489,10 @@ julia> exp(A) | |||
exp(A::StridedMatrix{<:BlasFloat}) = exp!(copy(A)) | |||
exp(A::StridedMatrix{<:Union{Integer,Complex{<:Integer}}}) = exp!(float.(A)) | |||
|
|||
Base.:^(b::Number, A::AbstractMatrix) = exp(log(b)*A) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This could actually call exp!(log(b)*A)
since the multiplication returns a new array.
changes between Julia 1.0 and 1.1, including: - Custom .css-style for compat admonitions. - Information about compat annotations to CONTRIBUTING.md. - NEWS.md entry for PRs #30090, #30035, #30022, #29978, #29969, #29858, #29845, #29754, #29638, #29636, #29615, #29600, #29506, #29469, #29316, #29259, #29178, #29153, #29033, #28902, #28761, #28745, #28708, #28696, #29997, #28790, #29092, #29108, #29782 - Compat annotation for PRs #30090, #30013, #29978, #29890, #29858, #29827, #29754, #29679, #29636, #29623, #29600, #29440, #29316, #29259, #29178, #29157, #29153, #29033, #28902, #28878, #28761, #28708, #28156, #29733, #29670, #29997, #28790, #29092, #29108, #29782, #25278 - Documentation for broadcasting CartesianIndices (#30230). - Documentation for Base.julia_cmd(). - Documentation for colon constructor of CartesianIndices (#29440). - Documentation for ^(::Matrix, ::Number) and ^(::Number, ::Matrix). - Run NEWS-update.jl. Co-authored-by: Morten Piibeleht <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Fredrik Ekre <[email protected]>
changes between Julia 1.0 and 1.1, including: - Custom .css-style for compat admonitions. - Information about compat annotations to CONTRIBUTING.md. - NEWS.md entry for PRs #30090, #30035, #30022, #29978, #29969, #29858, #29845, #29754, #29638, #29636, #29615, #29600, #29506, #29469, #29316, #29259, #29178, #29153, #29033, #28902, #28761, #28745, #28708, #28696, #29997, #28790, #29092, #29108, #29782 - Compat annotation for PRs #30090, #30013, #29978, #29890, #29858, #29827, #29754, #29679, #29636, #29623, #29600, #29440, #29316, #29259, #29178, #29157, #29153, #29033, #28902, #28878, #28761, #28708, #28156, #29733, #29670, #29997, #28790, #29092, #29108, #29782, #25278 - Documentation for broadcasting CartesianIndices (#30230). - Documentation for Base.julia_cmd(). - Documentation for colon constructor of CartesianIndices (#29440). - Documentation for ^(::Matrix, ::Number) and ^(::Number, ::Matrix). - Run NEWS-update.jl. Co-authored-by: Morten Piibeleht <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Fredrik Ekre <[email protected]>
Addition of NEWS and compat admonitions for important changes between Julia 1.0 and 1.1, including: - Custom .css-style for compat admonitions. - Information about compat annotations to CONTRIBUTING.md. - NEWS.md entry for PRs #30090, #30035, #30022, #29978, #29969, #29858, #29845, #29754, #29638, #29636, #29615, #29600, #29506, #29469, #29316, #29259, #29178, #29153, #29033, #28902, #28761, #28745, #28708, #28696, #29997, #28790, #29092, #29108, #29782 - Compat annotation for PRs #30090, #30013, #29978, #29890, #29858, #29827, #29754, #29679, #29636, #29623, #29600, #29440, #29316, #29259, #29178, #29157, #29153, #29033, #28902, #28878, #28761, #28708, #28156, #29733, #29670, #29997, #28790, #29092, #29108, #29782, #25278 - Documentation for broadcasting CartesianIndices (#30230). - Documentation for Base.julia_cmd(). - Documentation for colon constructor of CartesianIndices (#29440). - Documentation for ^(::Matrix, ::Number) and ^(::Number, ::Matrix). - Run NEWS-update.jl. Co-authored-by: Morten Piibeleht <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Fredrik Ekre <[email protected]>
Fixes JuliaLang/LinearAlgebra.jl#579.
I added some tests for existing methods
exp
.exp
is missing methods forRational
andIrrational
; I put in commented-out tests for those. I'm not sure if inserting speculative tests like this is an acceptable practice, I can take out those comments if not.