Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make artifact retrieval more convenient #43

Open
ablaom opened this issue May 27, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Make artifact retrieval more convenient #43

ablaom opened this issue May 27, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@ablaom
Copy link
Member

ablaom commented May 27, 2024

I wonder while we think of a remedy for #42, we can think about a better way for MLJ users to retrieve artifacts, without needing familiarity with the MLFlowClient API, and so requiring so many steps. What about something along the lines of a function MLJFlow.artifact(logger, run) to enable this workflow:

run = MLJ.save(logger, mach)
restored_mach = MLJFlow.artifact(logger, run)

Also, what if the user failed to record run? Is there no way to retrieve the artifact? Can artifacts be automatically tagged in some way that provides a user-handle for later retrieval, without knowing actual run object? So, instead of run above, we can subsitute the string handle?

@ablaom ablaom added the enhancement New feature or request label May 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant