From 82ca186e985b5f21fd76f636f83eb1ec18610e11 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: ArturoAmorQ Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 09:05:28 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] [ci skip] Update parameter_tuning_nested.py (#768) cffc4b70916936ed4df91fc658ef1293be2692ff --- _sources/python_scripts/parameter_tuning_nested.py | 2 +- python_scripts/parameter_tuning_nested.html | 2 +- searchindex.js | 2 +- 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/_sources/python_scripts/parameter_tuning_nested.py b/_sources/python_scripts/parameter_tuning_nested.py index 37fe73a9c..5c13cd28d 100644 --- a/_sources/python_scripts/parameter_tuning_nested.py +++ b/_sources/python_scripts/parameter_tuning_nested.py @@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ # ``` # # However, this evaluation only provides us a single point estimate of the -# generalization performance. As recall at the beginning of this notebook, it is +# generalization performance. As you recall from the beginning of this notebook, it is # beneficial to have a rough idea of the uncertainty of our estimated # generalization performance. Therefore, we should instead use an additional # cross-validation for this evaluation. diff --git a/python_scripts/parameter_tuning_nested.html b/python_scripts/parameter_tuning_nested.html index b62eacb39..0eb9d1b4b 100644 --- a/python_scripts/parameter_tuning_nested.html +++ b/python_scripts/parameter_tuning_nested.html @@ -1957,7 +1957,7 @@

With hyperparameter tuning