You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In sec 17.2.1 (rank test), the calculation (1+200)/2 = 100.5 might seem obscure to some.
Later you write this more clearly as shown below. Maybe move here?
In sec 17.2.2(vaccines), the pargraph below is hard to understand
The numbers in table 17.1 are obscure - where does 293 come from? (I assume it's ceil(585/2), but this needs to be explained.)
Finally you say that the multivariate hypergeometric distribution is explained in ch 3, but that only covers the univariate case, IIUC. So the code may not be very clear to some readers.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
murphyk
changed the title
sec 17.2.2 (bootstrap test for vaccine efficacy) has issues
sec 17.2 has some issues
Jul 7, 2023
In sec 17.2.1 (rank test), the calculation (1+200)/2 = 100.5 might seem obscure to some.
Later you write this more clearly as shown below. Maybe move here?
In sec 17.2.2(vaccines), the pargraph below is hard to understand
The numbers in table 17.1 are obscure - where does 293 come from? (I assume it's ceil(585/2), but this needs to be explained.)
Finally you say that the multivariate hypergeometric distribution is explained in ch 3, but that only covers the univariate case, IIUC. So the code may not be very clear to some readers.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: