Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use gnmi container to support configuration and telemetry #1496

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ganglyu
Copy link
Contributor

@ganglyu ganglyu commented Oct 13, 2023

Signed-off-by: Gang Lv [email protected]

What is the motivation for this PR?

Now SONiC uses telemetry container to support configuration and telemetry in master branch.
We propose to use gnmi container to support configuration and telemetry, and we will disable telemetry container by default.

PR:

PR title state context
Single image for gnmi and telemetry. GitHub issue/pull request detail GitHub pull request check contexts
Test for gnmi and telemetry. GitHub issue/pull request detail GitHub pull request check contexts
Migrate GNMI table in CONFIG_DB GitHub issue/pull request detail GitHub pull request check contexts

@ganglyu ganglyu requested a review from qiluo-msft October 13, 2023 02:55
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ sonic-restapi will be replaced by gNMI interface in the future.

sonic-telemetry provides gNMI/gNOI server interface. And sonic-telemetry provides only telemetry via gRPC, and the gap is configuration.

We will update sonic-telemetry to support configuration.
We will change the name of sonic-telemetry to sonic-gnmi, as it better reflects the functionality of the service. The gnmi container will handle both configuration and telemetry tasks, simplifying the deployment and management of the system.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I do not see detailed explanation of current situation (one telemetry), one container future usage, two containers future usage. Could you make them explicit for readability?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated.

@ganglyu ganglyu requested a review from qiluo-msft October 29, 2023 00:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants