Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

dnsmasq的缓存和dnsproxy的缓存?? #165

Closed
Potterli20 opened this issue Sep 23, 2021 · 4 comments
Closed

dnsmasq的缓存和dnsproxy的缓存?? #165

Potterli20 opened this issue Sep 23, 2021 · 4 comments

Comments

@Potterli20
Copy link

@ameshkov @EugeneOne1
你好,我测试了一下dnsmasq的缓存和dnsproxy的缓存,感觉dnsmasq上的缓存好用dnsproxy我感觉调用不出来。是否能进行一个缓存优化
Hello, I have tested the cache of DNSMasq and dNSProxy. I feel that the cache on DNSMasq is easy to use. I feel that DNSProxy cannot be called. Whether a cache optimization can be performed

@EugeneOne1
Copy link
Member

@Potterli20, hello. I'm not quite sure I've got your point. We already have a few issues on improving the cache (AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome#3598, AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome#2999, #53) so it will evolve and get better.

@Potterli20
Copy link
Author

Potterli20 commented Sep 24, 2021

What I want to say is dnSMASQ cache and DNSProxy cache. I find that DNSMASQ cache can be called, while DNSProxy cache gives me a feeling that it is not called

@EugeneOne1
Copy link
Member

While you're using dnsproxy CLI tool with --cache flag I can assure you it's called on almost (see issues from the previous comment) each request.

@Potterli20
Copy link
Author

Potterli20 commented Sep 24, 2021

While you're using dnsproxy CLI tool with --cache flag I can assure you it's called on almost (see issues from the previous comment) each request.

It didn't work. I switched to 4g cache, but it still didn't feel like I was calling cache. All requests on ADGH come from the DNSMasq program. As I mentioned in a previous post, dnsmasq takes precedence AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome#3518 (reply in thread)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants